Of course she did:
That two thousand dollar dress Michelle Obama wore to greet the pope http://t.co/GFCeJuCLqv
— Susan Glasser (@sbg1) September 24, 2015
Politico reports the dress sells for $2,290 at Neiman Marcus.
2k? Good grief. I thought it was from Target. That's where she shops, right? @AsheSchow @DLoesch @sbg1
— azwatergeek (@azwatergeek) September 24, 2015
Nope … not a Target dress!
And we’re so old we remember when Ann Romney was criticized over the cost of her clothes:
Anxiously await the media outrage that was given to Ann Romney.
*crickets* https://t.co/AuSquqh9ne
— Ashe Schow (@AsheSchow) September 24, 2015
https://twitter.com/zachward1/status/647057327363723267
Inequality on display. Where are the liberals who couldn't stop hating on Ann Romney? https://t.co/38vLGkRMsR
— Alyssa Krumm (@AlyssaKrumm) September 24, 2015
So much for everyone giving up some things…
What the Obama ladies wore to greet the pope http://t.co/ss9p2dflcP
— Amazon Princess™ (@rpowell8124) September 24, 2015
https://twitter.com/Coondawg68/status/647039467618889730
Sarah Palin, too, got this treatment:
Recommended
@AsheSchow @DLoesch I'm old enough to remember when the media had a stroke over the cost of Sarah Palin's wardrobe.
— John Hayward (@Doc_0) September 24, 2015
Ann’s dress cost $1690, to be exact. And while the press was noting the cost of Ann’s dress, the were ignoring the cost of Michelle Obama’s, natch:
https://twitter.com/FirstTeamTommy/status/433611420664889344
But this is nothing new to Twitchy readers. The wealth/spending of a candidate only matters when it’s a Republican:
Catty libs sneer at Ann Romney’s ‘slutty’ expensive outfit, claim she doesn’t know prejudice
Media fail: FLOTUS’ $6,800 jacket ‘princely’; The Romneys spun as totally out of touch
Mitt Romney, jet skis, and media double standards
Anti-Mormon bigot Cher: ‘Richy Rich Romney whitest man in magic underwear’
***
Join the conversation as a VIP Member